FromWade Readers’ Comments

Larry Walker:
This group (Social Permaculture) seems to be aligned with what you are doing. [MY NOTE: “Social Permaculture” is the praxis of permaculture methodology applied to social relationships.] (Larry’s email included the following.)

 In India, pioneers from 16 countries — ranging from billionaires to folks whose life’s possessions fit into a backpack — flew in for our Gandhi 3.0 retreat, to nuance that throughline from me-centered transactions to we-centered relationships to us-centered emergence….  If, however, the personal, interpersonal and systemic designs start to harmonize, the laddership hypothesis is that the collective emergence of that ecosystem bends its arc towards greater compassion…. how do we differentiate inner voice from ego voice?… How, ultimately, do we throw a better party and build a new paradigm?  (read more)

Wade Lee Hudson:

Thanks for the heads up. I added “permaculture” and “social permaculture” to my website to-do list. I do see considerable alignment. However, this report says nothing about “domination” or “mutual support.”

+++++

Re: New Introduction”

Dan Brook:

One thing that the recent flare-up in the Middle East taught me, or rather reminded me, is that many people who want a fairer world, besides lacking nuance, also exhibit selective kindness, that is, being kind to one’s “us” and too often being unkind to one’s “them”. And it happens in our treatment of animals as much as in our treatment of fellow humans.

Wade: Indeed. Well put. Thanks.

+++++

Dan Brook:

Re: “A Little Hole in the Global Left: Israel, Gaza, and Humanity, by Dan Brook. “I have been terribly disappointed in so much of the American and global Left that is so reflexively anti-Israel that they don’t care about [Hamas goals and violence]…”

Criticize Israel when appropriate, but in this case, start with criticizing Hamas for its homicidal desires and murderous rampage. This is not meant to excuse occupation, but to contextualize it…. I strongly oppose occupation and injustice — Israeli, American, Russian, Chinese, English, French, and otherwise

+++++

Yahya Abdal-Aziz:

Your essay “Does “the System” exist? is a very clear explication of your thinking.  I now have probably the clearest understanding of your concept that I’ve had in years.  Thank you for writing and sharing it!

As a once (and forever) systems analyst, I’ve been thinking in “system” terms for most of my life.  However, the use of the term “system” in philosophical, political and social theory can have quite different connotations than it does as a tool of business and information technology!  Somehow, I’ve come to feel that the former (“social science”) fields’ use is more laden with moral value judgments than the latter (“business engineering”), which is, on the contrary, more concerned with objective and measurable facts … and this is, doubtless, an unwarranted bias.

All that my experience really shows is this: that some things are easier to measure meaningfully than others …  Which of course I already understood, when during my studies and teaching, I encountered the fun task of devising appropriate measurement scales for psychological traits. (Including in the ’70s, a protracted, bemused and ultimately unsuccessful exploration of what kind of mathematics might support the concept of “latent variables”.)  Humility, it seems, is a lesson that I am doomed to repeat, until – one day, I hope – it sticks!

Meanwhile, I have your fruitful analysis of the existing Top-Down System – and its contra-positive, the fabulous Bottom-Up System – as tools to help guide my thinking toward better ways of living and thriving together.  Thanks again!

Wade: Especially considering your extensive experience with systems thinking, your comments hearten me considerably

Re: New Homepage and Preface

Yahya Abdal-Aziz:

More analytical questions, then – if you will:

  1. Which form (structure, format) better supports collaboration?
  2. Would some other structure work even better than either “book” or “encyclopaedia”?
  3. Supposing we were to design such a structure (as if from scratch!), what would our design goals be?

Wade:

Good questions. Do you want to offer answers?

+++++

Yahya Abdal-Aziz:

This was worth the read, and a bit of thinking about. It also links other articles on aspects of anger, which I may spend some time exploring.

Three Reasons Why You Need Anger.”

While anger gets a bad rap, studies suggest it can help us achieve difficult goals, if used wisely.

By Jill Suttie

Anger is not usually a pleasant feeling. When we feel we’ve been wronged—by, say, a slow driver or a boss or a noisy neighbor—our heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature go up, preparing us to confront the challenge. While releasing that tension may feel good in the moment, the aftereffects can be harsh….

Excellent article from a superb project, the Greater Good Science Center. I added it to Daily Reflections and my to-do list for addition to the CHC site.

+++++

Randy Thomas:

Remembering Mary’s MagnificatPoetry is one form of creative expression. In this our age, we need a diversity of creative words and inspiring images to change the current narrative. Poetry, prose, essays,plays, novels, rational analysis, dialogue and synthesis, art, music, Nature’s wisdom, astrophysics, cosmology, technology,

Ways of healing, integrating, and collaborative efforts of mutual empowerment to co-create more whole life affirming,sustaining  emerging and evolving relationships. I appreciate your essays as words and meaning to better relate and understand this creative movement and potential to manifest and transform ourselves , systems, structures ,processes, in our world.

Wade: Peace. And thanks for suggesting “Mutual Empowerment” as the title for the newsletter and sharing with me the distinction between embodied and disembodied spirituality. 

Rhonda Magee:

GOOD MORNING TO YOU

Rhonda sharing reflections – and a song! – onstage at “Wisdom and A.I,” hosted by Wisdom 2.0, October 30, 2023

Warm greetings to you. As we move into this new year, like many of you, I have been reflecting on how to make the most of this life, given all the challenges we face.

One thing seems certain: the times are calling – loudly – for greater capacity to hold together, as one, the things that appear to be separate, to make connections and common cause among things that appear different, or even seem to be opposed or opposite. Thinking of this, I am reminded that Martin Luther King, Jr. and Thich Nhat Hahn agreed that doing so is an aspect of what they each, from their very different cultures, religious commitments and social justice locations, referred to as “Beloved Community.” As I’ve discussed in prior presentations, being Beloved Community today is an invitation to each of us to make this ideal real in our own life and times.

Of course, doing so is hard. I lean into practices that support us in the moment-to-moment work of cultivating a kind of grounded hope. This year, I’m focusing on sharing ways of deepening the roots of our wellbeing in support of this work, offering practices for moving through shadow and light, joy and pain in our own and in others’ experiences. I’m exploring more ways of deepening our ability to hold space for complexity and change, both individually, and in our relationships with others.

I look forward to re-energizing our resources together and joining with you again in beloved community in the coming weeks.

Book Cover Order a copy of
THE INNER WORK OF RACIAL JUSTICE here.

Links:

Listen now and reflect with Rhonda on the theme of “Being Beloved Community in a Time of Polarization.” (Dharma talk delivered by Rhonda V. Magee at the San Francisco Zen Center on January 14, 2023.)

https://www.sfzc.org/teachings/dharma-talks/being-beloved-community-time-polarization

And make a plan now to join Rhonda on March 17, 2024 at 10 am Pacific Time/11 am Mountain Time for reflections on the theme, “Leading with Clarity, Courage and Compassion.” Hosted by the Upaya Zen Center. For information and registration, visit:

https://www.upaya.org/program/gathering-dharma-with-hoshi-rhonda-v-magee-online-2024/

Wade:
Thanks for sharing. Great work. Carry it on.

The Good Life

“Today’s future-positive writers critique our economies while largely seeming to ignore that anything might be amiss in our private lives,” writes Kristen Ghodsee. Even our most ambitious visions of utopia tend to focus on outcomes that can be achieved through public policy — things like abundant clean energy or liberation from employment — while ignoring many of the aspects of our lives that matter to us the most: how we live, raise our children, and tend to our most meaningful relationships.

Everyday Utopia: What 2,000 Years of Wild Experiments Can Teach Us About the Good Life

Interview with “Fluke” author, Brian Klass

The 2/6/24 Amanpour and Company episode concludes with a fascinating interview by Walter Isaacson with Brian Klass, author of Fluke, Chance, Chaos, and Why Everything We Do Matters. I posted the complete transcript under Systemic/ Articles/Essays/Op-eds and linked to this comment on the Systemic/Books entry.

The points that struck me most strongly include

KLAAS: A fluke is a highly consequential event that happens by chance or is arbitrary or random. And so, I argue in the book that our world is shaped by these and our lives are shaped by these much more than we imagine, but we just pretend otherwise because it’s much nicer to imagine that we have neat and tidy stories to make sense of our world and our own lives….

I think this is the sort of way that our world works, is partly between order and disorder,… A single thing can tip you over that edge and create an extremely consequential event that shifts how the world works….

we have designed a world that is particularly prone to these avalanches because the sand pile is extremely high by design. 

And what I mean by that is that you have this sort of system that operates with optimization and efficiency as its main priorities. And this means that we have no slack in the system. (Emphases added)….

If we had dealt with the problem of the lingering resentment in the American public, then Trump might have (failed)….

ISAACSON: How can an understanding of the role of flukes lead us to have a more resilient society, and let me even add a more resilient personal life?

KLAAS: Yes, I like this question because, you know, I think differently about the world and my own life, having written this book. I was not the same person three years ago. And the reason for that is because…I grew up in the U.S., where I was sort of told you have to sort of just make your own path. This sort of individualist mindset, the American dream, and so on. And it’s a culture that is extremely focused on control, right?

And I describe in the book how I was living, you know, what I described as a checklist existence. And I think when you start to think about the role of these forces that are sometimes arbitrary, accidental, and random, and also the chaos theory, the ripple effects of our decisions, it starts to liberate you a little bit, right? It starts to make you feel like, you know what, it’s maybe OK if I don’t have so much top-down control. And that’s what I’ve internalized as a lesson from the book.

In terms of society, I think the main lesson is resilience. I think that we have the tools to give us the illusion of control more than ever before. Because we have so much predictability and stability in our daily lives that we start to think that our world is also stable. And in fact, it’s the opposite. The stability in our daily lives is happening at the same time as the world is changing faster and more profoundly than ever before in human history.

So, in my view, this is something where politicians, economists, et cetera, need to understand that they are creating a world without slack, and the flukes are always going to be there. So, instead of imagining that we can have this top-down control, I think we have to have a little bit less hubris and also accept the limits of what humans can and cannot control. And I think that’s true for ordinary citizens as well as for politicians who are calling the shots.

Two points in particular strike me. First, Klaas’s reference to “a system that operates with optimization and efficiency as its main priorities” is intriguing. I’ve said that “the Top-Down System” is driven by people climbing social ladders to look down on and try to dominate and exploit those below and submit to those above. The drive to optimize and maximize efficiency seems consistent with my analysis. I want to get his book and see if and how these two drives overlap. I may need to modify my formulation.

Secondly, his comment about the drive to establish top-down control in personal lives suggests he has a holistic approach,. This comment encourages me to believe that his framework is consistent with mine, and I may be able to complement my analysis with his. Regardless, his assertion that we need to accept chaos in our personal lives is one I haven’t addressed before and will do so now.

The domination/submission paradigm

In saying that the domination/submission paradigm lies at the basis of many of our contemporary ills, I do not say that all of our ills can be traced to it, nor do I say that it is productive only of ill. In fact, I hold that certain versions of it can be useful and appropriate in various limited, specific, functional situations… However, in our culture we have tended to award to the functionally dominant persons and institutions a total value of superiority, privilege, and power that has often led to injustice, damage, and suffering.

I am suggesting that domination is basic to a great many ills from which our culture does suffer and that it may be possible to replace it with an alternative paradigm that would afford some improvement. I think that each of these paradigms lies at a sufficiently deep level in our consciousness to be a unifying principle for a great many particular behaviors, and therefore if we deal with the matter on a deep level, we could thereby effect alterations in the relatively superficial attitudes and actions much more efficiently than by trying to change those feelings and events piecemeal.

Beatrice Bruteau. a pioneer in interspirituality and contemplative thinking

Dear Subscriber,
I’ve rewritten the CHC website’s Introduction. The new opening follows. Your comments are welcome.
Wade
Introduction
 

How can we be kinder and fairer? This constantly updated digital book explores this question.

The principal answer is to promote positive changes in every sector — social, personal, cultural, economic, environmental, and political. Changes that move in the same direction and reinforce each other in an upward spiral.

The hope is that these efforts will coalesce in a new, powerful grassroots movement that unifies the many forces cultivating a more compassionate society — including the civil rights, electoral reform, #MeToo, human rights, call-in, anti-war, environmental justice, climate action, union, living wage, police reform, holistic democracy, immigrant rights, gay liberation, human potential, and interfaith movements.

This website envisions how this movement might emerge. It presents a framework that might help a strong organizing committee of community leaders make it happen.

Whether or not this movement crystallizes, compassion-minded people can advance its goals informally. They can use ideas presented here to enhance their efforts and plant seeds for cultural change.

This site has grown out of collaborations with many associates. Now I sum up my conclusions and invite you to help improve them.

+++++

The movement envisioned here would correct root causes of personal and social problems. It would promote fundamental reform throughout society. It would establish new structures to empower the powerless and control the powerful. It would establish public policy reforms and nurture improvements in how people treat each other in their daily lives. It would encourage soulful conversations, self-examination, active listening, and mutual support for self-development. It would unify everyone in the compassionate humanity community — those individuals and organizations who relieve suffering and promote justice.

This movement would include a political component that would regularly mobilize massive numbers to demand new, compassionate public policies and, if necessary, engage in nonviolent civil disobedience to promote its goals.

Most compassion-minded people focus on single issues, help others cope and thrive, spread humane values with mutual dialogues, and vote for candidates who support policies that enhance the common good. These activists could complement their efforts with some simple, not terribly time-consuming, methods that would enhance their effectiveness.

Widespread fragmentation is a major problem. Many people are isolated. Some have only one or two people with whom they discuss personal problems. Others have none. A compassion-minded movement must address this and other personal and social issues.

Political campaigns focused on a particular issue fade when the issue is resolved. The next campaign must then build a new organization, which is time-consuming and results in costly delays. A unified force that moves from issue to issue could accomplish more together than its components can achieve alone.

Making explicit commitments, they could support each other with their personal growth and join with others to engage in unified political action. This site suggests some such tools.

What could be the unifying goal of this movement?
My associates and I crafted a one-sentence mission statement: to serve humanity, the environment, and life itself. This focus could unify a wide range of concerned individuals and organizations. You can post suggested amendments or alternatives on “Our Mission.”

What’s the primary problem we face? Agreement on the nature of our primary common problem could help unify the movement.

Our society trains everyone to climb social ladders, look down on, and try to dominate and exploit those below — and submit to those above. Our institutions, culture, and ourselves as individuals are woven together into a single, self-perpetuating social system — the Top-Down System.  You can suggest amendments or alternatives to this description on “Our Primary Problem.”

Hyper-individualistic conditioning is deeply embedded. People keep quiet, hold back, and fail to assert themselves in order to avoid negativity or boost their prospects for advancement. They button up, conform, and submit.

People compete for seats at the table, but there aren’t enough seats for everyone. When one person wins, another loses. As people calculate how to advance or protect their interests, they become overly concerned about what others think about them.

Society defines leadership as the ability to get others to do what the leader wants. Bitter power struggles tear apart organizations. Collaboration and mutual empowerment become difficult. Society inflames divisive impulses.

Societies need a stabilizing social system that holds them together. Destroying the Top-Down System is no solution. Neither is waiting for it to collapse. Instead, we can keep healthy traditions, improve society where we can, and create new structures to better achieve our mission.

We can reform the Top-Down System into a Bottom-Up System that nurtures individual and community empowerment throughout society. We can develop collaborative leadership and democratic hierarchies that enable workers and members to hold their leaders accountable to their commitments.

What shall we call this movement? My inclination is to call it the “systemic reform movement.” This phrase refers to our primary problem: the Top-Down System. Other options include the pro-democracy movement and the compassion movement. You can comment on “The Name.”

What methods shall we use to achieve our mission?
One key method is mutual support for self-development. Social and political activists can help each other become better human beings by controlling or unlearning impulses that fragment unity. Open confidential dialogue with trusted colleagues can be profoundly rewarding.

Unfortunately, however, honest self-examination often hurts. Self-exposure can be embarrassing. Even worse, others can use your admissions against you. The reluctance to pay the price required to grow more deeply is understandable.

To drop your mask, pause your routines, look below the surface, and consider how to better nurture your self-development is difficult and complicated. It’s tempting to stay on auto-pilot, go with the flow, conform to established norms, submit to expectations, and suppress your instincts and your desire to engage in right action. It’s easy to just seek comfort, enjoy life, deal with daily struggles, care for yourself and your family, do a little bit here and there to help people, and vote for your preferred candidate.

However, the need for holistic and systemic reform is overwhelming. The selfish pursuit of power and the willingness to defer to power, as promoted by the Top-Down System, weakens organizations. Dealing with these personal issues that affect interpersonal dynamics is essential if we are to reform our society fundamentally.

You can nurture personal growth alone, by yourself, in the privacy of your mind. You can discuss these issues with your significant other. You can discuss them with a therapist, counselor, or spiritual leader. However, it’s also helpful to engage with peers.

Discretion is advised. Total honesty would be foolish. Nevertheless, considerable personal growth is essential. Small teams composed of compassion-minded people could help with this effort.

Peer support is powerful and important. In fact, we may learn more from our peers than from parents and teachers. Mutual aid is usually informal, but formal structures, such as study, support, and prayer groups, can also help.

This book suggests many ways people can organize intentional activities to enhance personal and collective growth. A compassionate movement could use these methods to strengthen its activities and promote fairness, compassion, and democracy throughout society. My associates and I have experimented with some of these tools.

Based on these experiments, my primary suggestion at the moment is that at least once a month, movement members 1) open small team meetings with a moment of silence and 2) confidentially report on their recent efforts to undo or control the desire to dominate and the willingness to submit for personal gain. This shared experience could nurture a sense of community among those teams who use these tools.

You can suggest an alternative primary method with a comment on “The Primary Method

+++++

The movement envisioned here could unify the compassionate humanity community. Change in each arena is equally important. Improvement in one impacts the others. If these changes move in the same direction, they reinforce each other and integrate the outer and inner realms.

We compassion-minded people can celebrate our unique identities while also seeing ourselves as members of the human family. As global citizens, we can work together for our shared interests, live in harmony with nature, appreciate the invisible spirit that animates life, and promote holistic and systemic reform — reform that is holistic because it addresses the whole person and the whole society and systemic because it addresses the Top-Down System.

We can grow a kinder and fairer society. We must.

I suggest this desired direction for the sake of discussion. The organizers of a new movement would surely modify them, or start from scratch.

In the meantime, I welcome suggested improvements in these proposals as I regularly edit them. You can comment on the blog posts or email me.